The article identifies three primary counterproductive risks. First, technological isolation: excessive closure of manufacturing and imports may cause the U.S. to gradually fall behind global progress in semiconductor equipment, materials, and downstream innovation. Second, supply chain fragility: forcibly concentrating core manufacturing capability domestically actually becomes more vulnerable to single-point disruptions during natural disasters or political conflicts, reducing rather than enhancing resilience. Third, resource misallocation: sustaining lower-efficiency domestic manufacturing through prolonged high subsidies may crowd out investments in technological innovation, causing long-term erosion of competitiveness. Combined, these three risks mean that if the policy becomes too aggressive, the U.S. itself becomes the party "fractured" by the supply chain strategy.